[talk-au] TfNSW Cycleways use in OSM

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Is it possible that they are listing 
roads with minor traffic, connecting
parts of real bicycle infrastructure?

In my city (Kraków, Poland) municipality
was doing someting like that.

Partially it was reasonable, partially
desperate attempt to hide traffic state
of bicycle infrastructure.
(And something like that should not
be tagged in OSM)
23 Feb 2020, 00:02 by suburbansilvervlogs at gmail.com:

> I'd agree - that's what I thought was going on? I understand shared_lane 
> as when they paint a bike in the leftmost lane of a road, or in the 
> middle of an alley/small residential road.
> With that said, TfNSW's definition - "On road facility type shared with 
> moving vehicles" - is a lot vaguer, so I wonder if they're tagging some 
> unmarked routes..
> I also agree with this; without any bicycle stencil, that should be classed as no bicycle specific facilities. Considering they already have lane and segregated lanes in separate classes, a stencil is about the only other class I could think of that meets the TfNSW definition.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200223/eefaf00f/attachment.htm>