[talk-au] Fire Station Operators
mapping at consebt.de
Sun Jan 5 09:15:03 UTC 2020
Similar to schools the building should be tagged
On 5 January 2020 4:55:26 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, this is
>there should only be one amenity=fire_station for a single fire
>Where possible I prefer to trace the site boundary as this can be
>information and put all the tags on that, and then just have a way
>it with building=yes an none of the fire station tags.
>But I think it's also fine to just have a node, or to just have the
>building without the site as interim solutions or for fire stations
>the extent is just the building which don't have a yard.
>On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 15:27, David Wales <daviewales at disroot.org>
>> Somewhat related to this.
>> Camden West Rural Fire Service has both a traced building, *and* a
>> site border.
>> Both are currently tagged with amenity=fire_station.
>> The building has the rest of the identifying tags.
>> I feel that it makes sense to only have one feature tagged with
>> amenity=fire_station, and the rest of the tags. Should this be the
>> building, or the site border?
>> See link below:
>> David Wales
>> On 4/1/20 2:39 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Sebastian Spiess <mapping at consebt.de>
>>> I've done one. Just clarifying regarding the branch.
>>> branch = Narrabeen Fire Station
>>> name = Fire and Rescue NSW Station 068 Narrabeen
>> I can't see clearly from Mapillary what the singe looks like, but
>> should be just "Narrabeen", without the "Fire Station" words. Then
>> could still have name=Narrabeen Fire Station.
>>> Is this how you suggested? Before the branch tag was the name.
>>> I've also added
>>> building = fire_station
>> Talk-au mailing
>listTalk-au at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-au