[talk-au] vine row tagging

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 14:13, John Bryant <johnwbryant at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looking more broadly, it looks like vine rows haven't been widely mapped
> before.
>

Do you need to?

I think it could be automatically assumed that all vineyards have their
vines in rows, approx the same distance apart?

I noticed vine_row_orientation
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vine_row_orientation>=* : vine row
orientation (in degrees)on the wiki page - wouldn't that be sufficient?

For vine *rows* (ie. the linear features within the vineyard), we've had
> suggestions of natural=tree_row,
>

If you were going to put a tree_row on every row of vines, you'd have
nothing but a solid mass of them!

denotation=agricultural,
>

Sorry, not sure what you mean with this?

and crop=grape,
>

Marked as being redundant as all vineyards grow grapes! :-)

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20201015/27971428/attachment.htm>