[talk-au] vine row tagging

nwastra nwastra at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 06:30:50 UTC 2020


Many vineyards have numbered rows with a tag on the end strainer posts to assist direction of workers, etc.
These could be numbered using the addr interpolation scheme and then individual rows would not need to be mapped but does need a close survey.

> On 15 Oct 2020, at 3:32 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 14:13, John Bryant <johnwbryant at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking more broadly, it looks like vine rows haven't been widely mapped before.
> 
> Do you need to?
> 
> I think it could be automatically assumed that all vineyards have their vines in rows, approx the same distance apart?
> 
> I noticed vine_row_orientation=* : vine row orientation (in degrees)on the wiki page - wouldn't that be sufficient?
> 
>> For vine *rows* (ie. the linear features within the vineyard), we've had suggestions of natural=tree_row,
> 
> If you were going to put a tree_row on every row of vines, you'd have nothing but a solid mass of them!  
> 
>> denotation=agricultural,
> 
> Sorry, not sure what you mean with this?
> 
>> and crop=grape,
> 
> Marked as being redundant as all vineyards grow grapes! :-)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Graeme
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20201015/ec08e33e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list