[talk-au] Rural Addresses in WA
Phil Wyatt
phil at wyatt-family.com
Mon Apr 26 03:43:40 UTC 2021
Is this how the linear schemes work? I spotted this in Brunswick East in Melbourne
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.77550/144.98142
Cheers - Phil
From: Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 26 April 2021 1:17 PM
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>; Alex Sims <alex at softgrow.com>
Cc: talk-au <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Rural Addresses in WA
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 12:27, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com> > wrote:
&, do we have permission to use that data, together with a waiver?
Yes we do, the SLK Points data is CC BY 4.0 and Main Roads WA have completed the waiver, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Western_Australia
I'm not too familiar with linear referencing schemes for addressing, and how they should/could be modeled in OSM. Is it just a matter of marking the origin and then the ways which use that origin? Could that be modeled as a relation with a node on the road as an origin and then the ordered road segments as way members? eg.
How would differences in road geometries resulting in different addresses work? Or are these created once and fixed and so we can store the actual point values as usual using addr:housenumber and addr:street and ignore that they are from linear referencing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20210426/5786ff99/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list