[talk-au] highway=service

[osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au]

I think this way is wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676954097

 

It’s currently mapped as a parking aisle, but as far as I can see from the imagery, that appears to actually be a pedestrian area, and not a roadway at all.

 

Yes, very clearly:

 

https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-33.8547285,151.06632,3a,68.2y,95.57h,92.03t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swmU2inPdEll5F_KUNUqO4g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DwmU2inPdEll5F_KUNUqO4g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D98.22062%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

 

From: Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, 16 August 2021 21:15
To: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] highway=service

 

And this one definitely should be inverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761

 

Agreed. Surprise no one fixed this already, I've done so now.

 

On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <talk-au at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-au at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:

Are you allowed as a cyclist to leave sidewalk using them?

 

Well in NSW you can't cycle on the sidewalk...

 

Is it OK to use them for u-turn?

 

Yes.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20210817/f22bf93f/attachment.htm>