[talk-au] Fwd: protect_class=22 in Australia

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Most of you will be aware of the work that Kevin, Brian & Steve started in
the US re replacing the various protect_class="numbers" with more
descriptive titles.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protect_class#Social-protected-area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_Named_protection_class_for_protected_areas#Social-protected_areas

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Proposal/Protect_class

We've been speaking privately regarding another proposal, & Brian has sent
me the attached re Oz "protect_class=22" locations that have been mapped, &
wondered if there are any better names for them?

What do we all think?

Thanks

Graeme


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 15:36
Subject: protect_class=22 in Australia
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>


Hello Graeme,

So I still doggedly work to reform protected area tagging.  I note that
there is a bunch of tagging in Australia that uses the value
protect_class=22.

See: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/126v

I'm wondering if any of this can be tagged with other tagging that uses
plain English?  If not, is there new tagging that should be created?
Anything you can do to reduce the count of "weird" protect_class values is
very helpful to the effort!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20210109/63fbc7c6/attachment.htm>