[talk-au] Can anyone make sense of this?
mapslittle at gmail.com
Thu Jul 29 23:43:10 UTC 2021
If the edits are accurate, legally acquired, ethical and respectfully build upon the work of previous mappers then, imo, so be it. “Necessary” vs “unnecessary” has never been a criteria for inclusion in OSM. If it were, heaps of edits would be up for challenge. You’ve informed the editor that the edits are not necessary and, assuming they’ve read your comment, they are clearly happy to continue adding them. So be it. We all have different interests and pre-occupations. That’s what makes OSM so unique and interesting, even if it is frustrating at times. It’s a big map.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-au