[talk-au] Can anyone make sense of this?
mapslittle at gmail.com
Fri Jul 30 09:23:11 UTC 2021
My apologies Thorsten and Frederik, I stand humbly corrected. Best wishes Ian
> On 30 Jul 2021, at 6:27 pm, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>> On 30.07.21 01:43, Little Maps wrote:
>> If the edits are accurate, legally acquired, ethical and respectfully
>> build upon the work of previous mappers then, imo, so be it. “Necessary”
>> vs “unnecessary” has never been a criteria for inclusion in OSM.
> It has, and it should. Anything added to OSM makes editing more
> complicated for mappers to come - *especially* when it's relations that
> always have the potential to trip up the newbie mapper.
> Something that is completely unnecessary reduces the ease of editing of
> our map while adding no value to compensate for that. It makes it harder
> for us to achieve what we want - a map editable by anyone.
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-au