[talk-au] Mapping non-existent streets?

[Andrew Harvey]

I agree with cleary, to map per what's on the ground.

The houses can still be mapped with addr:street=Esplanade even without the
street.

razed:highway=residential or removed:highway=residential I have no strong
view on for this situation.

On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 09:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 09:37, cleary <osm at 97k.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd say that we map what we can confirm "on the ground". The inclusion of
>> non-existent features in OSM is of no help to anyone.  In rural areas,
>> there are whole villages in which plans were approved and gazetted but
>> never constructed or, having once existed, have disappeared as the
>> population disappeared - google maps occasionally includes some of these
>> streets but we shouldn't.
>>
>
> So don't do anything about it - just mark the addresses as The Esplanade &
> leave it at that?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20210501/f80b3286/attachment.htm>