[talk-au] Unconnected ways

[Brendan Barnes]

We've previously used proposed tag fuzzy=[metres] for other "non track"
routes, which may be of assistance.


On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 14:36, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> More inclined to use description=invisible route on beach sand.
> On 26/11/21 2:12 pm, osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au wrote:
>
> Possibly path=link?
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
> <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 26 November 2021 12:34
> *To:* Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> <61sundowner at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
> <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Unconnected ways
>
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:54, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Same problem where a bushwalking route uses a beach. I was told IIRC it
> is ok to use highway=path with trail_visibility=no.
>
>
>
> Agreed, and while I still don't think it's perfect, it's probably the best
> compromise at the moment.
>
>
>
> You could also add informal=yes
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing listTalk-au at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20211126/7586d975/attachment-0001.htm>