[talk-au] Basic question

Adam Horan ahoran at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 22:25:10 UTC 2021


"Where something like the boundaries of a State Park and a forested area
are not the same."

I'd say that this is common and expected, and should be handled with
separate areas.

I feel it's very much the old style of mapping to put 'natural=wood' on a
park admin boundary.

Adam


On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 08:38, <forster at ozonline.com.au> wrote:

> Hi
> If you were told this by changeset comment, can you give the URL?
> Tony
>
> > Hi everyone
> > I am a basic OSM editor. I usually just correct obvious map errors I find
> > while hiking/cycling. I have tried to be a little more ambitious every
> now
> > and then, but I have found it can be quite difficult to keep other
> editors
> > happy with what I do.
> >
> > My question is: Can you have overlapping 'areas'? I was told by someone
> in
> > this group that you can't.
> >
> > For example; Where something like the boundaries of a State Park and a
> > forested area are not the same. This is the issue where I was told that
> you
> > can't do that.
> > This makes no logical sense to me as this happens all the time.
> >
> > I would appreciate some guidance on this issue.
> > Kind regards
> > Andrew Parker
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20211008/8854c39d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list