[talk-au] Source material.

[Andrew Harvey]

That would be great Ian. If you find that some useful datasets aren't
covered under the Vicmap CC BY waiver, but are CC BY licensed then we can
request an updated waiver to cover them.

Andrew Parker, it looks like State Parks for VIC are included in CAPAD
https://www.awe.gov.au/agriculture-land/land/nrs/science/capad/2020 which
we have permission to use, while there may be minor differences since it's
only from 2020, it's worth looking into. As others mentioned
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Victoria is
pretty much the definitive guide to what open data we can use, but anything
CC BY licensed could be used if we receive a waiver.

On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 07:49, Little Maps <mapslittle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Thorsten, I’ll spend some time later this week to examine all of
> the Vic gov datasets that look like they might contain a version of the
> State Forests boundaries and I’ll post a summary of what all the
> potentially relevant datasets do and don’t contain. This will (hopefully)
> help to resolve questions about copyright permissions and help editors find
> the most useful datafiles to use. Cheers Ian
>
> On 19 Oct 2021, at 12:05 am, osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au wrote:
>
> I might be wrong, but from reading the metadata of the derived dataset, I
> think the base dataset basically only has parcels, but not forestry
> specific information attached to that, while the derived dataset uses the
> parcels and then adds forestry specific information to them.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20211019/d95291f9/attachment.htm>