[talk-au] admin_level, suburbs and rendering; should the order be updated?

[Dian Ågesson]

Hey Andrew,

I don't believe anything was decided with regards to ACT districts. 
However, after looking into the details I don't think they actually fit 
in the administration boundary set up at all; seems closer to 
parishes/counties on other states than a "council" or locality.

Dian

On 2022-04-08 02:47, Andrew Harvey wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 09:33, Dian Ågesson <me at diacritic.xyz> wrote:
> 
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> Resurrecting this thread to see if there are any objections to 
>> implementing the following changes as part of the cleanup:
>> 
>> -Removing admin_level=7
> 
> Was there a resolution for Andrew Davidson's comment about ACT 
> districts being admin_level=7?
> 
> What's the resolution for the other existing items tagged admin_level=7 
> Sydney, Melbourne, Hobart, Adelaide, etc.?
> 
> I think these aren't sufficiently administrative boundaries so we could 
> remove the admin_level, boundary tags and replace type=boundary with 
> type=multipolygon?
> 
>> -Moving localities to admin_level=9
> 
> I'm happy with this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220408/65287e21/attachment.htm>