[talk-au] admin_level, suburbs and rendering; should the order be updated?

[Dian Ågesson]

Thanks Andrew,

I'll make the adjustments to level 7 and 9 in the update guidelines as I 
prepare them.

I can also add the Districts of the ACT in at Level 5 as well, although 
should it be documented for all states' counties? 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lands_administrative_divisions_of_New_South_Wales

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadastral_divisions_of_Victoria

Dian

On 2022-04-09 10:44, Andrew Davidson wrote:

> On 8/4/22 21:57, Dian Ågesson wrote:
> 
>> Hey Andrew,
>> 
>> I don't believe anything was decided with regards to ACT districts. 
>> However, after looking into the details I don't think they actually 
>> fit in the administration boundary set up at all; seems closer to 
>> parishes/counties on other states than a "council" or locality.
> 
> I was going to suggest that they get moved to admin_level 5 which could 
> be also used for counties in other states (that still have them).
> 
> Otherwise no problem with getting rid of level 7 and moving suburbs to 
> 9.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220411/5910b492/attachment.htm>