[talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

[Warin]

On 1/8/22 09:58, Adam Horan wrote:
> There's a small chance that they're proposed roads, but most likely 
> they're made up. I think all 3 changesets from this user need reverting.
> However the names are suitable for the areas where they've been added, 
> so someone has put some work into it.


Stated source of those road names is? Could be copied from a copyright 
source..


Less than a day since these edits.