[talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

[Andrew Harvey]

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 16:49, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 13:17, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We should explicitly tag every motorway with bicycle=yes/no because some
>> motorways allow bicycles and others forbid them.
>>
>
> & then you get situations like this:
>
>
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-28.535651543577&lng=153.53896264714&z=17&pKey=1164980277280563&focus=photo&x=0.3457481526763355&y=0.5159430950498471&zoom=2.6582278481012658
>
> then 100m further:
>
>
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-28.536232873317&lng=153.53874804183&z=17&pKey=387825812412523&focus=photo&x=0.4645538612648733&y=0.5690565818776447&zoom=1.5949367088607593
>
> which is tagged as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666546115
>
> Yes, it works, I guess, but to my mind it looks ridiculous, & also errors
> in Osmose etc as an unconnected cycleway!
>

I would probably not model that way, the onramp should merge much sooner
with the motorway and that should be good enough, unless you start mapping
paint on the road.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220818/211b8d5a/attachment.htm>