[talk-au] Path versus Footway

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 16:54, <osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

> As far as I’m concerned, footway, cycleway, path(, and bridleway) are all
> essentially the same thing, a non-motor_vehicle path, just with different
> implied default access restrictions.
>
>
>
> We should probably have a discussion about how appropriate the ones listed
> here are:
>
>
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Australia
>

Yep!

How do we handle this: https://goo.gl/maps/x39C4ky1w6S7XoLUA when motorway
says bicycle=no?

& similarly, you can't (at least in iD) add bike lanes to trunk roads.

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220202/3a02b973/attachment.htm>