[talk-au] Path versus Footway

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 19:32, <osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

> I assume these National parks where different rules are in effect have a
> boundary relation.
>
>
>
> In which case it would be possible to either:
>
>
>
> a) tag a def: directly on that boundary relation with the rules that apply
> or (maybe better in this case)
> b) create a type=defaults relation “Tasmania National Parks Defaults” with
> all the defaults that apply in national parks, then add that relation to
> any national park boundary relation where it applies as member with the
> role of defaults
>
> (b) is basically following the defaults proposal exactly, and allows to
> define the defaults once and the re-use them for all national parks.
>

A problem with that would be that in a number of cases that I know of, you
can ride a bike along the roads *into* the National Park, but you can't
then take your bike onto the walking tracks, so a Park-wide default may not
work?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220204/eede9325/attachment.htm>