[talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)

[osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au]

Maybe just awtgs=* for officially assigned values and awtgs:informal=* for when the mapper came up with it?

 

Or generally awtgs=*, but add a source:awtgs=official/”name of organisation”/informal ?

 

Cheers,

Thorsten

 

From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2022 11:30
To: Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Steer <iansteer at iinet.net.au>; OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)

 




 

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> > wrote:

I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.

 

Personally, I like awtgs=*.

 

As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to individual ways vs route relations and if it's only tagged based on officially assigned values or if mappers can evaluate and decide the value on their own.

 

Looking at those guidelines, it's up to each Council / Organisation to work out the value by the "worst" feature of any particular track, so I'd think we could do the same - follow the guidelines then designate this track as "Grade 3"?

 

 Thanks

 

Graeme

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220208/2caef01d/attachment.htm>