[talk-au] 2377 occurrences of fixme="unknown type of water crossing"

[Andrew Harvey]

It's not usually clear to me from imagery if it's a ford or culvert, even
some small bridges may not be visible on imagery, so I think it's safest to
leave these for a survey.



On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 14:02, Ewen Hill <ewen.hill at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>   A lot of you may have seen and fixed a node on a road adjacent to a
> stream with a single key of fixme="unknown type of water crossing", what I
> didn't realise until I ran an overpass  query
> <https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%2F*%0AThis%20is%20an%20example%20Overpass%20query.%0ATry%20it%20out%20by%20pressing%20the%20Run%20button%20above!%0AYou%20can%20find%20more%20examples%20with%20the%20Load%20tool.%0A*%2F%0Anode%0A%20%20%5Bfixme%3D%22unknown%20type%20of%20water%20crossing%22%5D%0A%20%20(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%0Aout%3B&C=-36.84446;127.79297;4> was
> that there were 2377 of these fixme remaining in Australia and they were
> all added by a single organisation.
>
>    A lot of these are clearly fords on dry/intermittent creeks and I can't
> see the reason for not mapping these as fords instead of adding the fixme
> note to limit the amount of editing now required to fix these imported
> fixme notes, most from 2018 and 2019.
>
> Row Labels Count of @version
> 1 1649
> 2 604
> 3 104
> 4 12
> 5 5
> 6 1
> 7 1
> 13 1
>
> As the node is adjacent to the stream, I can't see how to easily edit
> these where it is clear it is a bridge or predominantly a ford in an easy
> process. e,g, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6839769585
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Ewen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220223/1c5a5d2b/attachment.htm>