[talk-au] Am I using addr:unit correctly?

[Andrew Harvey]

Your use of addr:unit looks correct here, I don't believe it needs to be
subdivisions of a single building. You could have villa style townhouses
where each dwelling is a separate building on a single site, where each
building has it's own addr:unit and they all share the same
addr:housenumber.

We should update the wiki to describe this as a valid scenario.

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 10:24, Dian Ågesson <me at diacritic.xyz> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I had assumed that the addr:unit tag would be the appropriate place for a
> unit number in a subdivided block (specifically a complex such as this:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024067987
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024067987#map=17/-38.06484/145.14231>
> ).
>
> The wiki seems to suggest that the addr:unit is for subdivisions of a
> single building though and doesn’t seem to be the right tag?
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:unit
>
> Dian
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220127/727998b8/attachment.htm>