[talk-au] sac_scale [Was: Deletion of walking

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 11:05, <iansteer at iinet.net.au> wrote:

>
>
> I think we should just stick with the AWTGS as it stands.  It seems to be
> gaining widespread government support, and even if it is not perfect, it
> seems like a standard that is going to stay with us.
>

So, working on this idea, looking at
https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/21475/dse_trail_grade_brochure_tagged.pdf,
& having a play, a first draft comes up with something like:

*AWGTS Class 1* *Criteria*


*OSM*
Distance Xxx (<5k)
Distance=4.5




Gradient Flat
incline=no



steps=no




Quality Well formed
surface=paved / compacted

Wheelchair OK
wheelchair=yes




Markings Sign-posted
trail_visibility=excellent




Time (closest 15 / 30 minutes /
Duration=00:15 / 15 minutes

Hour / half-day / day)





Experience Nil


All the rest slot rather well into existing tags, although "incline" may be
a bit iffy?, but don't know what to do with the "Experience" field?

The Guide says:
Class 1 / 2 - "No experience required"
Class 3 - "Some bushwalking experience recommended"
Class 4 - "Experienced bushwalkers"
Class 5 - "Very experienced bushwalkers"

A new key perhaps: AWGTS_scale=1-5, with descriptions as above?

What do you all think?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220131/972eb3c9/attachment.htm>