[talk-au] sac_scale [Was: Deletion of walking

[stevea]

> On Jan 30, 2022, at 8:16 PM, Phil Wyatt <phil at wyatt-family.com> wrote:
> I think Class 1 specifically mentions disability access so I would hate to see that combined in any way with other classes.

+1:  I agree that "disability access explicit" and "how much experience you have as a bush-trail walker" are orthogonal (statistically independent).  OSM, as we tag (especially newer, evolving tagging schemes) DO want to keep orthogonal semantics separate.  This can be another value, another key, another sub-key...we know the drill.  But to conflate two wholly different semantics into one key, mmm, not generally a good idea.

Fun discussion otherwise!