[talk-au] Fwd: Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections
Graeme Fitzpatrick
graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 23:28:07 UTC 2022
Continuing on with that line of thought & looking at the example mentioned
in the other thread:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-31.99548/115.99338
How should that left turn from Tonkin Hwy to Hale Rd be mapped?
As a relatively smooth curve the way it is now, or as an abrupt 45° angle
at the physical traffic island eg ___/_|__ ?
Thanks
Graeme
On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 at 08:58, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Looking back at the notes from the previous discussion & spotted this
> comment:
>
> "only split the way at the point where you can no longer physically change lanes."
>
> Physically, or legally?
>
> Looking at the Princes Hwy/William Rd
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779286918/history> example, yes,
> there's only a painted line & island that you can physically cross, but
> that would mean doing an illegal lane change.
>
> Are we supposed to worry about that, or not?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 19:57, Luke Stewart <suburbansilvervlogs at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> (forgot to x-post to talk-au)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The standard rule and the way that I map is to only begin a new way if
>> there is some form a physical separation, so extra turning ways which can
>> be completed with a box but are modelled as curves aren't following this
>> rule (same goes for ways that start when lanes start rather than branching
>> off where the physical separation begins).
>>
>> Whilst there are arguments like "it looks better" or "helps with
>> routing/direction finding/navigation", these are not reasons to break osm,
>> rather to improve software.
>>
>> In the case of the Princes Hwy/William Rd
>> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779286918/history> intersection, the
>> residential road should be drawn straight through the intersection, with
>> the right turn lane specified with keys such as turn:lanes and change:lanes.
>>
>> As for how to resolve with this user, probably affirming a regional
>> consensus would be most convincing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Luke
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220305/16ce8d48/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list