[talk-au] access=destination was [Ticket#2021093010000048] HighRouleur

[Sebastian Azagra Flores]

In using the tag access=permissive, how does one verify that access has not been revoked by the owner?
In one of the changesets in question, the site clearly private property (as it is a retirement village)
I would have thought that access=private would have been a better tag to use in lieu of destination. 




regards,

Sebastian 

> On 21 Mar 2022, at 1:44 pm, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 10:22, <forster at ozonline.com.au> wrote:
>> Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit  
>> traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the  
>> access=destination tag.
>> 
>> Have I got it right? Right enough to revert any tagging that does not conform?
> 
> See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Local_Traffic_Only and the linked discussion thread.
> 
> Those example changesets look questionable to me, but I don't have the local knowledge. Private property open to the public is more "access=permissive". access=destination really should only be for something signed as not allowing through traffic. I'd suggest adding a changeset comment to invite them here to discuss further, if you don't hear back then I think it's reasonable to revert.
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220326/891a35b1/attachment.htm>