[talk-au] HighRouleur edits

forster at ozonline.com.au forster at ozonline.com.au
Sun Mar 27 03:26:57 UTC 2022


Hi Sebastian

There are 4 issues in play

1) changing to footway when not signed otherwise
2) are cycle routes cycleways or footways, specifically Changeset: 118627943
3) access=destination
4) Way: 679145843

1) Sebastian, your changing shared ways and cycleways to footways when  
there are no signs does not meet community consensus. If you have  
other reasons for changing to a footway, for example the Botanical  
Gardens document, then retagging is OK. I know you believe you are  
right and the community consensus is wrong but I ask you to cease  
retagging when there is no sign and go with community consensus. Can  
you make that undertaking?

2) Changeset: 118627943, I have taken Mapillary photos, best left till  
they are available

3) Are you OK with the access=destination being removed for networks  
with 0 or 1 outside connections and from 2 or more outside connections  
when there is no signage?

4 Way: 679145843 has been opened up for discussion on the list.

Thanks
Tony





More information about the Talk-au mailing list