[talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 32

[Anthony Panozzo]

He is actively clicking buttons right now, leave me alone while I take a look at what he is doing



From: talk-au-request at openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au-request at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:32 PM
To: talk-au at openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 32

Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
        talk-au at openstreetmap.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        talk-au-request at openstreetmap.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        talk-au-owner at openstreetmap.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 30 (Luke Stewart)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 14:35:55 +1000
From: Luke Stewart <suburbansilvervlogs at gmail.com>
To: Anthony Panozzo <panozz at outlook.com>
Cc: "talk-au at openstreetmap.org" <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 30
Message-ID:
        <CABO5kcwRZxan-qtr6Cbhy+7vWyhyHgsoeS+=PeYjntHC7vb8rQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Point is, the restrictions that you added in the case of the motorway
on/offramp was incorrect, it was broken by you at some point. In addition
to being broken, there was also a duplicate no_u_turn that was added by you
(which was in fact valid). So there is no problem in deleting something
invalid as long as you can ascertain what it is meant to be. This can very
easily be achieved by looking at object history for many times where iD has
broken the relation. Do you seriously think that TheSwavu (and many other
people for that matter) have been blinding looking at objects without
imagery, object history, or other sources to confirm? There is no universe
where keeping that invalid relation was a good idea, and it was doing
nothing for routing whatsoever.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220503/ef2cc90a/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


------------------------------

End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 32
****************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220503/d826bbdd/attachment.htm>