[talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

[forster at ozonline.com.au]

Hi Sebastian

You sent me private message, 15/10/22 20:52:39 EST.
In it you agreed that consensus had been achieved even though you  
thought it was wrong.

I was disappointed to then see further tagging changes which in my  
opinion go against community consensus.

Changeset: 127828054
172362952, v4 cycleway changed to footway
170529137, v5 cycleway changed to footway

Changeset: 127827849
995759320, v2 cycleway changed to footway
995753641, v3 cycleway changed to footway

Changeset: 127561873
15 Oct 9:28am (UTC?), I think this is after your mail to me.
It lists source:  
https://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/files/assets/public/things-to-do/parks-and-reserves/pdfs/seaford_wetlands_reserve_2018.pdf
This source may not be allowed because of copyright
1024370763, v2 bicycle=yes, foot=yes changed to bicycle=no foot=no
a highway=footway with foot=no makes little sense, if you are correct  
then its just an informal path with access=no?
827522368, v7 bicycle=yes changed to bicycle=no
Seaford Wetlands Trail (770944899) bicycle =yes changed to bicycle=no

Maybe I have misunderstood but it seems to me that you continue to act  
against community consensus though you agree that consensus had been  
achieved. Your thoughts please.

Thanks
Tony