[talk-au] Should a "trail" route relation be one-way?

[Ian Steer]

> 
> What would people think about a structure that had a Munda Biddi master
> relation, containing only 3 sub-relations:
> 1.  the existing relation containing the main route (including both north &
> south-bound one-way sections, plus the winter/summer routes)
> 2.  a new
> "Munda Biddi Collie Spur" relation 
> 3.  the existing Munda Biddi Alternate
> relation (that is presently a sub-relation of the relation containing the main
> route) containing all the hut spurs, huts etc
> 

- and I would give the winter section, and northbound one-way sections in the main route relation a role of "alternative"