[talk-au] Tagging Trucks (hgv) "Use low gears"

[Andrew Hughes]

Agree, but still would think both are better. Plus, it's difficult to tag
the way(s), as we don't necessarily know where the 7% ends. Whereas the
sign is a single point location and can be easily geographical tagged.

On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, 8:03 pm Warin, <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 8/2/23 16:07, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks for the quick responses!
>
> Andrew Harvey: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 seems better than
> traffic_sign=AU:R6-22;AU:G9-83  but I can see why you say both would be
> valid.
> Q: Let's say there is also another sign "Zombies Ahead" that doesn't have
> a NTC code at the same location. Would that be separated with a semi-colon?
> and tagged as....   traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83;Zombies Ahead
>
> Graeme, ideally the "7km" is recorded in the tagging... mostly because
> some juro's do this so they don't need to place "end of .... signage". But
> on that subject....
> Q: lots of signage such as G9-82 (see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia ) also includes the
> % slope. This is perhaps similar to the  "7km" supplementary information on
> the sign and perhaps the same convention could apply to both. For example
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-35.05425945999999&lng=138.53492903000006&z=19.9&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=798881551059257&focus=photo&x=0.49105747415321865&y=0.5517154385592334&zoom=0
>
>
> The '% slope' would be the key 'incline' that can simply be applied to the
> road way.
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20230302/9cf12505/attachment.htm>