[talk-au] Why set coast line to nation park or, administrative boundaries?

[Warin]

On 29/3/23 14:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au 
> <talk-au at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>     Since the coastline tag is also supposed to represent the high
>     water mark then I would say that they should be snapped together
>     (since they then represent the same feature - that is, the high
>     water mark). This would mean that the boundary data already in OSM
>     from the government basemaps would just be their own mapping of
>     the high water mark, and probably be less up to date or refined as
>     our own.
>
> Exactly. So if anything we should be actively snapping them.


Are there any links to these boundaries linked to the high water mark???


I would have though that CAPAD data would be accurate as it should come 
from the National Parks people using the gazette.


My trove searches only turned up low water mark stuff - but I only 
looked in NSW.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20230331/583a4101/attachment.htm>