[talk-au] Checking on site relation

[Warin]

This collection looks to be operated by the same firm .. but each site 
has a different name ... and different facilities...

See 
https://reflectionsholidays.com.au/parks/wee-jasper/accommodation/?type=unpowered-sites

And https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1811175182



So I'd delete the site relation, put the operator tags on each campsite.

Probably a web tag to the individual campsites - eg 
https://reflectionsholidays.com.au/parks/wee-jasper/accommodation/fitzpatrick-trackhead-reserve/


On 14/7/24 14:58, Alex Sims wrote:
>
> I’m not an expert but I had a look at the wiki 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site#Alternatives and it 
> points to a multipolygon relation of a series of “outer” elements. At 
> the moment the relation is a collection of nodes, but really they are 
> areas, possibly not well defined, but certainly large enough to put a 
> tent up in. I’d be changing the nodes to areas which would make sense 
> and then a multipolygon to join them all together. I note also that 
> there is poor downstream support for a “site” relation.
>
> Alex
>
> *From: *Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, 14 July 2024 at 12:55 pm
> *To: *OSM-Au <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject: *[talk-au] Checking on site relation
>
> Could one of our relation experts please have a look at 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17833891#map=13/-35.1636/148.6804 
> to see if I've done it properly?
>
> It relates to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4266915 where 4 
> separately named campgrounds are all linked together under 1 overall name.
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20240714/f0ed8606/attachment-0001.htm>