[talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Tom Brennan website at ozultimate.com
Fri Mar 1 04:51:58 UTC 2024


I can agree with the last sentence, but not much else.

I think most of the people in this thread genuinely want to work with 
the various parks services to get OSM solutions that work for both parks 
and the OSM community.

We don't currently have any good communication channels.

If we can get the right lines of communication - which is difficult when 
you have OSM and NPWS being both distributed and bureaucratic in their 
own ways - I'm confident that we will be able to get outcomes that 
everyone is happy with.

Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com

On 29/02/2024 10:42 pm, Adam Steer wrote:
> Thanks Tony.
> 
> The first crux as I see it is that the OSM community doesn't listen. It is
> unable to hear values other than some abstract academic notion of map
> purity.
> 
> The second crux is that OSM mappers are not responsible or accountable for
> anything. So taking the view that "everyone should come to OSM and justify
> themselves" is pretty weird and backwards.
> 
> What about taking the approach "ok land managers what can we do to help
> you?" And if the answer is "stop reverting parks service  edits", then
> respect that ...
> 
> A better map isn't one with all the everything. It's one made respectfully
> and responsibly.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



More information about the Talk-au mailing list