[talk-au] Track route names used to name paths

[Warin]

On 20/5/24 20:10, Mark Pulley wrote:
>> On 18 May 2024, at 5:36 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 18/5/24 00:10, Mark Pulley wrote:
>>> I’ve just uploaded a changeset deleting the overlapping ways for the 
>>> Grand Clifftop Walk.
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151456052
>>
>> Thanks Mark. That is quite a bit of work.
>>
>> I would have done it later in a week or two, just to make certain 
>> there were no objections.
>>
>> I started the Grand Cliff Top Walk relation so as to get it on 
>> https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=17595958&type=relation&map=15.0/-33.7223/150.3398
>>
>> then I came across the overlapping ways ...
>>
>> My thoughts are ...
>>
>> You have to be very careful with using 'route signs' to name paths.
>>
>> Without knowledge the path name may not be the route name, so I would 
>> not tag the path with the name unless I could verified it.
>>
> I wasn’t sure if this last section was a general comment or 
> specifically for this changeset.


A general comment. I could not take 'route markers' (where ever they 
might be) to imply the path name without more information.

The route relation is most useful for 
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ and the renders who use the route 
relations.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20240521/62231591/attachment.htm>