<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 11:07, Greg Lauer <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Just so I am clear on this issue.
We are not asking DERM to change the current CC4 licence. We are asking DERM to give us formal permission to use the data. This can be as simple as an email from a responsible party at DERM giving us permission. Am I interpreting this correctly?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We're not asking for them to license the data under ODBL or any other license, we're asking for a waiver which provides one exception and one clarifications to their data released under CC BY to ensure compatibility with the ODBL license and clarification on how OpenStreetMap provides attribution (which based on a strict, not taking an chances, reading of the CC BY 4.0 license, OSM's attribution may not be enough to satisfy CC BY 4.0). This is detailed at <a href="https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/">https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/</a>.<br><br>The waiver is the last page of <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3PN5zfbzThqeTdWR1l3SzJVcTg/view">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3PN5zfbzThqeTdWR1l3SzJVcTg/view</a>. DERM (or whatever their abbreviation is these days) said they won't agree to the waiver once, and then again a second time in Dec 2018.</div><div><br></div><div>All the other green departments from <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue</a> were able to agree.</div></div></div>