[OSM-talk-be] about primary - secondary ... roads
Ben Laenen
benlaenen at gmail.com
Wed Aug 19 11:32:57 UTC 2009
Luc Van den Troost wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Just would come up with this example in Beerse.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.32282&lon=4.85996&zoom=16&layers=B000F
>TF
>
> Some history. The main road N132, is / was as currently marked on the
> map.
>
> The one-way rule, however, came later and now traffic going from south
> to north is guided by signs along the east side of the block, trough
> streets that belong to the municipality.
>
> That brings up 2 questions:
>
> 1. shouldn't this indicated route in the opposite direction be marked as
> 'secondary road' as the N132 is?
That's what I mean with bending the rules to adjust to the topology of the
network. So I'd tag them secondary if the N132 is still a regional road.
> 2. should this opposite direction route be marked as N132 too?
No, that's something else. That road doesn't have a road number.)
Greetings
Ben
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list