[OSM-talk-be] busroutes
Maarten Deen
mdeen at xs4all.nl
Tue Aug 10 09:21:17 UTC 2010
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0200, Ivo De Broeck
<ivo.debroeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> What i propose is keeping the existing relation for the "normal"
> direction.
There is no "normal" direction with buses.
> Example stadsbus nr 8 go from Bertem - Leuven - Bierbeek (check the
> relation with the relation checker). Give the same relationnumber to
> all bus-stops for that direction.
You mean: add the stops to the relation.
> If you are in Leuven you can choose the bus 8 to Bierbeek (relation
> one) OR bus 8 to Bertem (relation 2).
And there comes the part for the "from" and "to" tags in the relation
which I thought had no use. You always "take line X towards Y". And
having the from and to in the relation will specify Y.
Oh, and
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/Public_transport_schema>
has a more elaborate tagging scheme.
Regards,
Maarten
> 2010/8/10 Renaud MICHEL
> Le mardi 10 août 2010 à 10:22, Tim Francois a écrit :
>
>> +1. Yup, this is what is currently happening in most of the UK - a
> > separate relation for the 'up' and 'down' bus routes, so that
> > forwards/backwards (which is kinda broken as a concept in this
> case)
> > is not required!
>
> I'm interested, for now I have created single relation for a bus
> route in
> Liège.
> How should I tag the two separate relations?
>
> The page
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses [2]
> doesn't talk about double relation, but suggests that bus_stop
> should be put
> on the way, but the bus stops are not on the road but along it.
>
> --
> Renaud Michel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org [3]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be [4]
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list