[OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppuntennetwerk/Cycle node network

[Ben Laenen]

On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:12:05 Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
> It makes perfect sense to me and I totally agree.
> But I assume you mean  ways in stead of nodes in 'So the route relations
> should only contain (a preferably) continuous set of nodes'
> 
> On top of that,  I find it handy when the route realations have a name,
> so it is easy to see which are the relations of a road.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/73069100
> When they have 2 or 3 meaningful letters in front (followed by a space)
> of the numbers, you can also easily see on the hike or bike maps which
> network is in place
> eg ZD 239-240 = Zuid-Dijleland from node 239 to 240

Do not give names to the route relations of cycle and walking node networks. 
They don't have names so you shouldn't invent one. Use the "note=*" tag for 
what you want to put in the name tag, and JOSM will gladly show the note to 
you in the relation list.

Greetings
Ben