[OSM-talk-be] Workshop Trage Wegen

[Jo]

Where "trage wegen" are being reinstated they are 'named' as Voetweg xx or
Buurtweg yy. Usually there is a name tag on both sides with the same number.
Occasionally there is an arrow with the name of the street the path leads
to. It doesn't hurt to use Voetweg xx or Buurtweg yy as the name when it is
on a street sign.

Polyglot

2011/6/11 Wouter Hamelinck <wouter.hamelinck at gmail.com>

> > The convention I see for mapping buurt- and voetwegen is as follows:
> > name=Voetweg xx
> > or
> > name=Buurtweg yy
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.88679&lon=4.58564&zoom=16&layers=M
>
> In fact, using the name tag is mainly a bad idea because in the Atlas
> der Buurtwegen/Atlas des Chemins Vicinaux every chemin/sentier has a
> name along with the number. But as far as I know those names are not
> used today except when they survived time and are still used as
> regular street names. As an example, the street where I live is in the
> atlas Chemin no. 3 and has the name "Oudenpontweg". Today it is a
> regular street of which the major part is named "Kerkstraat" and a
> minor part "Oude Pontweg".
>
> Of course, the atlas is only interesting for what is today a path-like
> thing. For those I have never seen a use of the name from the atlas.
> In e.g. community councils it is always the number that is mentioned.
>
> wouter
>
>
> --
> "Wie niet in zichzelf gelooft, komt nergens."
>                                        - Thor Heyerdahl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110611/6145ce00/attachment.htm>