[OSM-talk-be] Workshop Trage Wegen
Ivo De Broeck
ivo.debroeck at gmail.com
Sat Jun 11 18:13:38 UTC 2011
I think this is (very) good idea.
2011/6/11 Gerard Vanderveken <Ghia at ghia.eu>
> **
> I think it is a good idea to name the unnamed paths and tracks to its
> Voetweg and Buurtweg name from the Atlas if these roads exists there.
> Many muncipalities are rediscovering, revaluating and inventarising these
> old and sometimes almost forgotten and often neglected roads.
> Many times these unnamed paths get then signs with their Atlas name and
> number.
> Sometimes when there is a local name in speaking language, the restored
> path will be baptised with that name. In that case we alter the name in OSM
> to that new name.
>
> It will help these task groups a lot, if they find on our maps already an
> inventory of the still existing roads.
> Our maps are also ready to use in displaying particular roads or road
> segments on their websites.
> That way it will also spread OSM to the general public and in return we may
> benefit with survey materials from them or get some new mappers.
>
> To me, it makes perfect sense to give all unnamed roads in OSM (tracks and
> paths) that exists in the Atlas also their Atlas name and number as name.
>
> Regards,
> Gerard.
>
>
> Wouter Hamelinck wrote:
>
> If it is on the street sign, I agree to put it in the name tag.
> Here, they get new names in most communities. My personal favourite is
> "Kakhoekweg". Yes, it exists right here:http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.98051&lon=3.85697&zoom=17&layers=M
> There is a sign with that name. The sign on the southern end was
> recently vandalised, so go to the northern end if you would like to
> check.
>
> Map what you see in reality can never do harm.
>
> wouter
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Where "trage wegen" are being reinstated they are 'named' as Voetweg xx or
> Buurtweg yy. Usually there is a name tag on both sides with the same number.
> Occasionally there is an arrow with the name of the street the path leads
> to. It doesn't hurt to use Voetweg xx or Buurtweg yy as the name when it is
> on a street sign.
>
> Polyglot
>
> 2011/6/11 Wouter Hamelinck <wouter.hamelinck at gmail.com> <wouter.hamelinck at gmail.com>
>
> The convention I see for mapping buurt- and voetwegen is as follows:
> name=Voetweg xx
> or
> name=Buurtweg yyhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.88679&lon=4.58564&zoom=16&layers=M
>
> In fact, using the name tag is mainly a bad idea because in the Atlas
> der Buurtwegen/Atlas des Chemins Vicinaux every chemin/sentier has a
> name along with the number. But as far as I know those names are not
> used today except when they survived time and are still used as
> regular street names. As an example, the street where I live is in the
> atlas Chemin no. 3 and has the name "Oudenpontweg". Today it is a
> regular street of which the major part is named "Kerkstraat" and a
> minor part "Oude Pontweg".
>
> Of course, the atlas is only interesting for what is today a path-like
> thing. For those I have never seen a use of the name from the atlas.
> In e.g. community councils it is always the number that is mentioned.
>
> wouter
>
>
> --
> "Wie niet in zichzelf gelooft, komt nergens."
> - Thor Heyerdahl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
--
Ivo De Broeck
Valleilaan 13
3360 Korbeek-lo
Tel (0)16 43 84 93
Gsm +32 486 17 61 13
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110611/8c1548a8/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list