[OSM-talk-be] associatedStreet

[Tim François]

Funnily enough we've just been having a similar discussion on the talk-gb
list. As it currently stands, JOSM complains if more than one "street"
member is included in the relation. However, there are people who are just
ignoring this and adding all relevant highways for the particular street
(i.e. all those with the same name) as "street" members. There are others
who mentioned that maybe the highways that make up the street be in one
relation, and then that relation is the "street" member in the
associatedStreet relation. No decision has been made on the talk-gb list on
this.

Hope this helps,

Tim

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:

> I also tagged a more complicated one:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481829/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481828/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481830/history
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481831/history
>
> I guess it can't be helped that several relations are needed?
>
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110318/146f4bf4/attachment.htm>