[OSM-talk-be] New village boundaries?

[Gerard Vanderveken]

Altough it is a geographical location,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.7876&lon=4.5993&zoom=13&layers=M
I think it is some commercial act from a wine maker (see monteberg.be)

As said: ignore, unless you get confirmation of the town Heuvelland that 
there is a new hamlet.
Regards,
Gerard.

Sander Deryckere wrote:

>
>
> 2011/11/6 Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com <mailto:benlaenen at gmail.com>>
>
>     On Sunday 06 November 2011 12:08:10 Sander Deryckere wrote:
>     > Hi, some months ago, I drew a lot of West-Flemish boundaries.
>     They were
>     > based on out-of-copyright ferraris maps, with checking the
>     history of the
>     > village on Wikipedia (to see if there were new villages created).
>     >
>     > But yesterday on a walk, I saw this sign:
>     >
>     https://picasaweb.google.com/105567941221792569561/Heuvelland?authkey=Gv1sR
>     > gCOTc7tuYrZy6Ig#5671834208381401762
>     >
>     > I never heard of the village "Monteberg". Ok, it's a mountain I
>     know, but I
>     > never heard of it as a village. And even after the fusion of the
>     70's, they
>     > still make new boundaries.
>
>     Probably some fantasy of the person in charge when they placed
>     those signs.
>
>
> A weird fantasy.
>
>
>     > Does anyone know what I have to do with this?
>
>     Ignore :-)
>
>
> All right, probably the best thing to do indeed.
>
>
>     Greetings
>     Ben
>
>
>
> Greets,
> Sander 
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-be mailing list
>Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20111106/2decd324/attachment.htm>