[OSM-talk-be] Some maxspeed mapping questions

[Jo]

Oops, forgot to add a link to the former mini_roundabout in question.

I'm adding it to this thread, because it all started with a bus stop
Marc wanted to add there :-)

Jo

2011/11/11 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:
> While starting to change a mini_roundabout which wasn't actually a
> mini_roundabout, I went a little overboard and this is the result:
>
> It is a 'verhoogd kruispunt', so I tagged all the elevated ways with:
>
> traffic_calming=table
>
> And the places where the bumps are 'felt' with:
>
> traffic_calming=bump
>
> I added the cycleways and cycleway tags and then I had to change the
> rcn and rwn relations
>
> The rcn had this, which I have been removing everywhere, since it's a
> Dutch word:
>
> nettype=knoop
>
> I left these tags:
> rit=xxxxx
>
> Although I don't know what they stand for and where they come from.
> Should they stay? Are they useful for anyone? I don't think rit is an
> English term and there are maybe 100-150 out of 5000 routes which have
> this tag.
>
> Concerning the nettype. While editing a bit in Germany (and in the
> border area Hohes Venn), my script ran in trouble when trying to
> detect new rcn routes, because the Germans use rcn for many different
> kinds of cycle routes. In the mean time I found that normally I can
> distinguish between the cycle node networks because we don't use ref
> tags and they do on the other networks.
> While 'complaining' about the mess, they suggested I add an additional
> tag to the cycle node network rcn relations, since those were the
> exception worldwide. So, does it make sense to add something like:
>
> network:type = numbered_nodes
> nettype = numbered_nodes
>
> to our rcn networks?
>
> Sorry for rambling on and on... those are questions that I've been
> wondering about for a while and which all surfaced now during the
> editing of a simple junction...
>
> Jo
>