[OSM-talk-be] How do I tag these addresses?
Jo
winfixit at gmail.com
Sat Nov 26 18:18:06 UTC 2011
This is very much a corner case...
Step 1:
Select a node with a low housenumber. Press 'a' and connect to a higher
housenumber.
Select this new way and tag it with: addr:interpolation=even (or odd, of
course).
Select one of the footways with a simple name by means of Ctrl-LMB (left
mouse button)
Now you have two ways selected.
Now I press 'e', but that's not the default shortcut key for Address
Interpolation (oh, it helps a lot if you install the associatedStreet and
terracer plugins)
Then a dialog window comes up.
Click on the radio button
o Relation (Create new) (the first time at least)
and tick
v Convert way to individual house numbers.
All the rest is not needed and would be added as tags in the wrong place
Two things happened. An associatedStreet relation was created for you, you
can add addr:city addr:country addr:postcode yourself to it, as tags. No
need to repeat those on every address node..
The other thing that happened is, you have an address node for each house
now.
Now it kind of depends. If you want those house numbers to be applied to
building outline closedways, then proceed as follows:
I use 'w' to create a rectangular building around all those address nodes
There is no need for this to be exact, it will become clear why right away.
Now open the associatedStreet relation and select all the houses, then
press the button which selects those address nodes. ('select objects for
selected relation members' is the tooltip)
(Make sure you close the relation editor window at this point, otherwise
you'll get an edit conflict later on)
Then use Ctrl-LMB to add the building outline and you can also select one
of its corner nodes, which is nearer to the lower number.
Now I press 't', to activate the terracer plugin.
No need to tick create an associatedStreet relation, we already have that
Leave
v delete outline way ticked
Some serious magic happens and all the address nodes have disappeared
(including their history). The info on them now belongs to the building
outline closedways, which were created.
Reopen the associatedStreet relation and all those buildings to it, assign
the role 'house' to them.
To be continued... I have to run
(I'm creating an example, but it's not done yet)
Jo
2011/11/26 Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> When I started mapping, I tried to map this place:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.810407&lon=3.301597&zoom=18&layers=M,
> and with bing images: http://binged.it/w1gsNq (don't look at the names in
> Bing, they're just wrong).
>
> But when I was home, I couldn't get any of the names right, so I changed
> it all to fixme's. Now, after a long time, I went back and understood how
> everything is (with the help of satellite images that weren't available
> back then).
>
> Apparently, the front doors of those houses are on the side of the
> footpaths (where you can't drive your car). While the post boxes are on the
> side of the service roads (where you can drive your car).
>
> Now, where should I place the address POI? At the front door? Or at the
> place where you have the post box and can drive with your car?
>
> And is it OK how I tagged the streets? I tried to use the results we got
> from a discussion some weeks ago about streets with a dual name.
>
> As a final thing, is there a way to use associated street relations on
> this (if so, with which way)?
>
> Regards,
> Sander
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20111126/511900b4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list