[OSM-talk-be] Yippee! JOSM is the best! :-)

[Gerard Vanderveken]

Maybe you need a CSS rule for relation[boundary]?
 
Gerard.

Jo wrote:

> Hi Julien,
>
> I'm glad you find my post useful. Did you manage to show the bus stops 
> the way that you like?
>
> If not, if you point me to one of your bus stops, I'll try and see 
> what I can do. For myself, I'll probably be showing the zone number of 
> the stops, this way.
>
> In the mean time, I've improved a bit on the concept:
>
> way[boundary]
>  { color: #000066; width: 2; opacity: 0.6; dashes: 24,4, 4, 4; 
> z-index: 4;} 
> way[boundary=administrative]
>  { color: purple; width: 2; opacity: 0.2; dashes: 24,4; z-index: 4;}
>  
> node[rcn_ref]
>  {text-color: green;
>   font-size: 17;
>   text: rcn_ref;
>   text-halo: #aaffcc;
>   text-halo-radius: 2;
>   text-position: right;}
>
> relation[type=network][network=rcn] > node::relation_underlay
>  {text-color: red;
>   font-size: 17;
>   text: rcn_ref;
>   text-halo: #aaffcc;
>   text-halo-radius: 2;
>   text-position: right;}
>
> area
>  {text-color: red;
>   font-size: 18;
>   text: name;
>   text-position: center;}
>
>
> Now it shows the CNNs/FKP'en that are part of a network in red on cyan 
> and the other ones in an ugly greenish grey on pink. Later on, I'll 
> probably want to assign each network its own color.
>
> For some reason the boundary is not drawn differently, which I think 
> would be helpful since unsurprisingly those cycle node networks tend 
> to have boundaries on the borders between the provinces.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jo
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-be mailing list
>Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20110908/5b620362/attachment.htm>