[OSM-talk-be] Designation=*
Ben Laenen
benlaenen at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 11:17:59 UTC 2012
Hi everyone,
I'd like to use the current activity on the mailing list to solve a few
tagging issues...
First up: the F99a/F99b/F99c traffic signs (i.e. these signs
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Roads_and_paths_signed_with_traffic_sign_F99a.2FF99b.2FF99c
)
We need an extra tag that says these roads have that specific traffic sign to
determine the exact access rules. I currently just use traffic_sign=*, but
that may be a problem if there are more traffic signs at once. Hence I'd like
to look at the designation=* tag (see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation ). But the problem is that
the name our government gave to these roads is basically unusable for a tag.
We can just translate it and make something like
"designation=road_reserved_for_agricultural_vehicles_pedestrians_cyclists_and_horse_riders"
but yeah, I guess you see the problem with a tag like that... But I have no
better idea...
Second problem, and somewhat the same: the nature reserves (this message
concerns about Flanders only, I don't know the regulations about this in
Wallonia, but we have to keep in mind that there are different rules about
this over there, and in Brussels of course). The paths and roads in nature
reserves are signed with these kind of signs:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Flemish_Nature_Reserves
Now, we need some way to tag that these roads belong to a nature reserve,
again to correctly know the access rules on these roads from the tags. This is
also an excellent candidate to use the designation=* tag. I'm personally
thinking about "designation=flemish_nature_reserve" (the tag has to include
somehow that it belongs to Flanders, but maybe it's not necessary if you think
boundaries are enough to determine this, so we can just use
designation=nature_reserve).
Let your voices be heard
Ben
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list