[OSM-talk-be] RandoVelo Vs RAVeL

[Julien Fastré]

I agree with Ben's answer.
Julien

Julien Fastré
Messagerie Jabber/XMPP: julien at fastre.info (compatible Gmail)



Quoting Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com>:

> On Monday 07 May 2012 11:07:27 Mars Hell wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> In Wallonia, there is 2 types of bicycleways.
>> RVx and RAVeLx, which one should be at the layer 1 if the two are national
>> network (ncn). RVx are from an asbl. RAVeLx from SPW (service public
>> wallonie).
>> So, RAVeL should be upper than RVx. What do you think about it?
>> How could be shown in cyclemap?
>
> They should stay at the same ncn level. It's about their function, not about
> who maintains them. If you want to distinguish, there are tags like
> "operator=*"
>
> Greetings
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20120508/a32acd24/attachment.sig>