[OSM-talk-be] Question regarding Cycle node networks tagging.

[Jo]

There is a way to keep it in one relation, if understood the issue
correctly:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1632662

ways can be members of relations multiple times. This happens often in bus
routes, even when both directions are mapped in separate relations. Just
look at some of the relations around the railway station of Leuven.

I think the cycle route itinerary is OK now, even though it's quite absurd
to send a bicycle around like that, when the cyclist could just as well get
off and become a pedestrian for a few meters.

Jo


2012/5/11 Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com>

> Hi, I just found out how a certain part of the node network is
> implemented. See the link below to have an overview:
>
>
> http://openfietskaart.nl/?zoom=14&lat=50.93426&lon=3.12985&layers=000B0FFFFFTF
>
> The issue is the route between 76 and 77. The route from 76 to 77 is
> correctly mapped. But if you look at the map data of the crossing between
> the Zuidstraat and the Paterstraat (near kpt 77), you see that there are
> turn restrictions (which apparently also counts for bicycles).
>
> So when you go from 77 to 76, you first have to go to the north on the
> crossing with the Zuidstraat. Then you follow the Grote Markt, Manestraat,
> Vrouwenstraat, Sint-Michielsplein and afterwards, you turn again into the
> Zuidstraat, but this time you take it in the south direction.
>
> I think it's not possible to get all this info in one relation without an
> ambiguous route (since the Zuidstraat is taken twice for the route in one
> of the directions).
>
> So should I split this in a 76-77 and a 77-76 route? Or is there an other
> way that would be supported by most tools that use those relationships now?
>
> Regards,
> Sander
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20120511/1688d7b0/attachment.htm>