[OSM-talk-be] opendata.antwerpen.be

[Sander Deryckere]

It's normal they keep their IP rights.

It means that they still have to right to give the data to selected people
under another license (like a license that doesn't require source
mentioning). All people do this, also open-source software writers.

Apart from that, I agree they are talking to us, and want us to use the
data. So even if it's not completely legan (in other words, a lawyer might
find a hole), we can use it. And if there are complaints, we can still
figure out what to do.

Regards,
Sander



Op 8 november 2012 23:38 schreef Jan-willem De Bleser
<jw at thescrapyard.org>het volgende:

> Another relevant point in the license:
>
> "De toegekende rechten hebben betrekking op: ... De samenstelling van
> collaboratieve databases - Het maken van tijdelijke of permanente, en
> geheel of gedeeltelijke reproducties met om het even welk middel en in
> om het even welke vorm, met inbegrip van afgeleide databases of als
> geheel van collaboratieve databases - Het geheel of gedeeltelijk
> verspreiden, mededelen, bekendmaken, verhuren, ter beschikking stellen
> of publiek verspreiden van de informatie, met om het even welk middel
> en in om het even welke vorm, met inbegrip van afgeleide databases of
> als deel aan een collaboratieve database"
>
> They're talking to us here, I believe. They've obviously foreseen that
> groups like OSM and companies like, say, Foursquare, will want to use
> this data.
>
> I have only one issue. The license says they retain all their IP
> rights, so is this compatible with the contributor terms of OSM? Or,
> are we maybe creating a derivative work when we map based on their
> data?
>
> - Jw
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20121108/d0f23e18/attachment.htm>